Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

Dynaxer HP5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

14

3

5

3

Best position

#8

#7

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

15.0

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

356

63

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

42%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

46%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Michelin Primacy 4

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Continental Ecocontact 6

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Dynaxer HP5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison