Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

Dynaxer HP5

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

14

3

5

Best position

#8

#7

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

15.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

356

36

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

62%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

42%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

59%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

62%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

78%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

46%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

85%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

83%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Continental Ecocontact 6

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Advantage

Dynaxer HP5

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison