Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Advantage

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

14

11

10

14

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

11.6

6.0

5.5

Latest test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

122

109

700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Dry

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Comfort

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Advantage

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison