18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
5
5
3
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
2.8
4.8
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
139
158
36

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison