18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Number of tests
14
5
7
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
13.4
2.8
2.4
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
139
137

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison