Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Advantage

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

14

1

5

4

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

1.0

2.8

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

153

66

139

40

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison