Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

14

4

5

14

3

1

Best position

#8

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

3.3

2.2

3.6

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

40

63

194

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison