18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
16
11
1
4
Best position
#8
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
5.5
11.6
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2023
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
153
122
66
40

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison