18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
16
3
24
5
Best position
#8
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.4
5.5
3.7
2.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
153
36
302
139

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison