18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
18
10
16
5
Best position
#8
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
13.4
6.1
6.0
5.5
2.8
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
153
47
109
153
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store