18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
14
18
49
28
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#1
Average position
13.4
6.1
3.2
2.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2026
Available sizes
153
47
213
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store