18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
21
3
4
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
11.9
1.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
165
23
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Comfort
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Costs
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store