Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Advantage

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

14

3

14

4

5

1

Best position

#8

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

3.7

3.6

3.3

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

36

194

40

63

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Dry

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry steering response

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Comfort

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Advantage

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison