18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
3
18
5
4
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
1.3
6.1
2.8
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
23
47
139
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store