18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
3
18
4
5
Best position
#8
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
1.3
6.1
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
23
47
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store