18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
14
3
2
Best position
#8
#1
#1
Average position
13.4
1.3
1.5
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
23
66

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison