Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

14

10

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

3.6

6.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

153

194

109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

95%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

78%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Dry steering response

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison