18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage SUV
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Number of tests
2
5
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
6.5
4.4
Latest test
2021
2026
Available sizes
25
99

Offroad

Offroad
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison