18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
6
4
5
5
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
Average position
19.3
12.0
2.2
2.8
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
4
111
63
139

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison