Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

10

4

3

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

19.3

6.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

4

109

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Cooper CS7

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Falken Sincera SN110

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Goodrich g-Grip

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison