18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
10
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
19.3
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
4
109
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store