18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
10
28
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
6.0
2.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
4
109
67

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store