18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

BF Goodrich g-GripUpper-middle
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Kleber Dynaxer HP4Upper-middle
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP4

6.7
R14 – R17
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Also compare with
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
11
10
4
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#2
Average position
19.3
11.6
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
4
122
109
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Cooper CS7BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Falken Sincera SN110BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMKleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store