Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

BF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Kleber

Also compare with

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

6

11

18

10

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

19.3

11.6

6.1

6.0

Latest test

2019

2024

2026

Available sizes

4

122

47

109

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Price/value

BF Goodrich g-Grip

68%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Cooper CS7

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Falken Sincera SN110

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Browse by brand

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Goodrich g-Grip

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison