18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
11
18
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
19.3
11.6
6.1
Latest test
2019
2024
2024
Available sizes
4
122
47

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison