18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
6
6
4
Best position
#6
#4
#3
Average position
19.3
19.0
12.0
Latest test
2019
2020
2025
Available sizes
4
129
111

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison