18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
6
6
11
Best position
#6
#4
#1
Average position
19.3
19.0
11.6
Latest test
2019
2020
2024
Available sizes
4
129
122

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison