18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
6
3
Best position
#6
#4
#2
Average position
19.3
19.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2020
2025
Available sizes
4
129
36
Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store