18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
6
6
14
Best position
#6
#4
#8
Average position
19.3
19.0
13.4
Latest test
2019
2020
2026
Available sizes
4
129
153

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison