18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
1
1
4
Best position
#6
#1
#1
#2
Average position
19.3
1.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
4
27
66
40

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison