Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

BF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

6

4

5

3

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

19.3

3.3

2.8

1.3

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

4

40

139

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Costs

Confidence

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Comfort

Confidence

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Dry

Confidence

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Cooper CS7

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Falken Sincera SN110

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Goodrich g-Grip

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison