18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
6
3
6
Best position
#6
#2
#3
Average position
19.3
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
4
36
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store