18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich Advantage 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
18
3
4
3
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
14.3
6.1
1.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
292
47
23
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Costs
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Tread pattern comparison

BF Goodrich Advantage 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store