18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich Advantage 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
3
3
23
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
14.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
292
36
191

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Dry
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Costs
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store