18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich Advantage 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
1
5
Best position
#5
#7
#1
Average position
14.3
7.0
2.8
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
292
88
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Dry
Confidence
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Costs
Confidence
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Comfort
Confidence
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Tread pattern comparison

BF Goodrich Advantage 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store