18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BF Goodrich Advantage 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Continental
UltraContact
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
1
3
Best position
#5
#7
#2
Average position
14.3
7.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
Available sizes
292
87
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dry
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Tread pattern comparison

BF Goodrich Advantage 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store