18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
1
9
23
Best position
#6
#4
#1
Average position
6.0
7.2
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
63
176

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
48%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
46%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
30%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison