18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
4
23
14
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
3.3
3.6
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
111
176
194

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison