18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
1
13
4
Best position
#6
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
1.0
4.3
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
25
66
123
40

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison