Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

4

10

4

3

Best position

#6

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.0

3.3

6.0

12.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

25

40

109

111

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Confidence

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Confidence

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Confidence

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs Tristar Snowpower HP

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison