18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
6
3
4
Best position
#6
#3
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
25
146
36
40

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison