18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
14
4
1
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
3.6
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
194
40
66

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison