Strengths
Economical with relatively low tire wear, helping to save on replacement costs.
Weaknesses
Dangerous weaknesses in wet conditions, posing a significant safety risk.
Very noticeable weaknesses on dry roads, leading to reduced performance.
Overall very unbalanced performance, which may affect stability and handling.
Low mileage, meaning the tire may need to be replaced sooner than average.
Poor sustainability, making it a less environmentally friendly choice.
Performance Analysis: Lassa Driveways
This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.
Loading comparison data...
Timeline
2022
Lassa Driveways was launched
2022
Lassa Driveways was tested 1x (Autobild)
2023
Lassa Driveways was tested 1x (ADAC)
2024
Lassa Driveways was tested 1x (Autobild)
Sizes
Similar tires
Lassa
Driveways
Lassa Driveways in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Lassa Driveways was featured:All tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Lassa Driveways | 39,5 | 34,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
poor
Ranked #46 of 50
Finishing 46th out of 50 competitors, the Lassa Driveways tire faced significant criticism for its overall performance. Notably, it received a final rating of 'Poor,' primarily due to its concerning inadequacies on both dry and wet surfaces. Testers highlighted its inefficiency on dry roads, pointing out a barely sufficient feedback through the steering wheel, and a lack of precision that necessitated frequent corrections during turns. Its handling at the limit was also deemed barely adequate, contributing to its poor evaluation in safety. The tire's performance significantly deteriorated on wet roads, where it demonstrated dangerous weaknesses, including inadequate grip and a propensity to understeer or oversteer early and persistently, which severely impacted its rating in wet conditions. Despite these shortcomings, the tire was acknowledged for being economical with relatively low wear and received moderately good marks for its aquaplaning resistance and efficiency. However, the low projected mileage and sustainability concerns due to its production in Turkey marked down its environmental score, culminating in an overall unsatisfactory assessment for the Lassa Driveways tire.
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Lassa Driveways | 3,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Lassa Driveways | 39 | 34,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 0% (1x) |
|---|
| Poor |
| 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
