Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Zeetex (0%). The first tyre test of Zeetex HP2000 VFM was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the HP2000 VFM and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Zeetex HP2000 VFM
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
