Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Falken EuroWinter VAN01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the EuroWinter VAN01 were tested.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
