18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this summary, we are comparing two summer tyres: Vredestein ULTRAC manufactured in Hungary and the Fulda EcoControl HP2. Notably, the latter is successor of the previous Fulda EcoControl HP model.


The Vredestein ULTRAC, which has been dormant equipment for the BMW 2-series Active Tourer, gets a lower rating of 21%. However, the tyre seems to excel in both wet and dry conditions according to test results from Autobild and ADAC. Among its strongest features, wet handling, dry handling, and aquaplaning stand out. Despite these high-performance capabilities, it's worth noting the model falls short in terms of fuel consumption and tyre wear.


On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 performs better in our rating, reaching up to 69%. According to Autobild's testing, it exhibits significantly low exterior noise, a factor that contributes to a peaceful drive. Furthermore, the tyre demonstrates exemplary performance in terms of dry braking and durability. On the downside, the Fulda model shows some weaknesses in lateral support on dry roads.


In terms of competition, the Vredestein tyre performs relatively well, landing the 3rd position out of 55 tyres in the Autobild test. Conversely, in the same test, the Fulda tyre came in at the 16th position. When compared by ADAC, the results are closer together, with the Vredestein tyre placed at no. 13 and the Fulda in 14th position out of 16 tyres.


Overall, these tyres have their strengths and weaknesses based on diverse testing situations. The Vredestein ULTRAC is notable for its excellent driving dynamics and performance in both dry and wet conditions but has a lower lifespan and high rolling resistance. The Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a solid performing and economical tyre with exceptional ride comfort, but struggles with lateral support on dry roads.


Considering these insights, it's clear that the preferable tyre, between the Vredestein and Fulda models, hinges on the drivers' preferences of handling, comfort, noise, and longevity factors.

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
8
10
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
12.8
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
30
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Fulda EcoControl HP2
68%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Dry Performance
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Economy
Vredestein ULTRAC
46%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Fulda EcoControl HP2
84%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
32%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison