Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Vredestein (30%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
