Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 97% compared to 72% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R18 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
