Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken Azenis FK520
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 74% compared to 72% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 35.3 | 27.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: - | 219 | 102 | 117 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
