18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
5
6
3
Best position
#11
#1
#3
#2
Average position
17.0
4.4
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
99
146
36

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison